The American Government: Doomed From Its Inception

“Long, long ago, King Henry of England told Prince Hal that the way to run a country and keep the people from being too critical of how you run it, is to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels.”

—Dan Smoot, in The Invisible Government

One of the first steps toward establishing a civilization’s government or ruling body, with its attendant departments, is securing land which, even today, is usually executed by force and mandated by false treaty under the guise of some forced “international law.” The area is secured using a strong military presence, normally UN troops in armored vehicles, backed up by a private military force equipped to handle any incursions by foreign invaders and border raiders.

Once the force has established a secure stronghold, a form of government is established, with its accompanying rule of law that serves as an effective control over the population. Of course, all of these steps were planned well in advance, years even, and carried out swiftly and efficiently.

The Modern Government: Designed to Fail

Today, all governments are controlled by one entity and its extraterrestrial handlers. Each government was carefully designed and constructed, its leaders identified, groomed and emplaced not on merit or popular vote but by their degree of subservience (first), personal chemistry (second) and public charisma (third).

The US government is no different. From its inception, it was blueprinted and controlled by dynastic men hidden deep within the Roman system, built by highly malleable proteges, administered by well-trained minions, and maintained by highly ignorant people whose loyalty was unparalleled, if not radical (read: patriotic).

Perditorus Rex: A Blueprint for the New American Colonies

PerditorusRexThe Jesuits prepared to pave over the paradise that was America in several distinct steps over 170 or so years, a long-term project that was conceived by the Black Pope and his Jesuit militia in Rome, and carefully written down as a “playbook” in 1773, known only to a handful of Jesuits. William Garner hypothesizes that the Black Pope Lorenzo Ricci did not languish and die in a Roman prison, in 1775, as revisionist history tells us, but rather, with the expert assistance of fellow Jesuits, faked his own death, traveled to America, and became the puppet master who acted behind the scenes for many years, using the playbook Garner calls Perditorus Rex.

Ricci and the Jesuits made 50- and 100-year plans, the general outlines of which are still being used to this day because they have proven so efficacious. If one studies the Jesuits’ methods of subjugating a country, they will discover a striking pattern of similarities among all the take-overs.

How to Build a Nation in Four Easy Steps

Step One: Kill the Indigenous Population

smallpox-killed-the-native-americansThe Jesuits first sent over early scouts to kill off the indigenous population, then established a “white-man’s foothold” on the soil of the New World. The settlers carried with them new viral diseases originating from the farming regions of the Old World, which served to sicken and kill tens of millions of Native Americans. Although not seen in any modern revisionist history books, the scouts traveled up and down the eastern seaboard in search of indigenous Indian populations to decimate, using the greatest tools of warfare: the virus.

This invisible band of warriors, the small pox and influenza viruses, among other cultivated viruses and bacteria, killed more people in a short period of time than any natural geologic disaster or seasoned army could ever have done in years of continuous war. The Jesuits knew the power of the Plague and wielded it like a 100-megaton nuclear device. The murdering of Native Americans was ethnic cleansing at its most efficacious.

Curiously, during the initial days of the Black Plague that sacked more than half the population of Europe, hundreds of black-robed men were seen carrying dark sacks emitting a “putrid odor.” The Black Plague was systematically spread by these Roman members of the church, which, hundreds of years later, farmed out its game to America, to kill the natives and pave the way for future settlements by marauding Europeans.

Over the first several decades of European rule, the leftover denizens of the eastern seaboard were trained to fear the white man and his deadly cargo of disease and modern weaponry. Those who were not killed by the great viral bomb were either enslaved or forced to settle elsewhere.  Either way, the Native Americans lost their lives, homes and livelihood to the invading white warriors from Europe.

Step Two: Establish Rule

BuildingJamestownFortFollowing the initial first wave of scouts in America, the Jesuits sent its next contingent, America’s future despots and controllers, which occupied Jamestown, Virginia and soon spread to Maryland, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New York and beyond. The Jesuits used the old method of control: conscription of “bloodlines.” In ancient England, there were no so-called “bloodlines,” which were an invention of Romish powers. In forming the leadership of America, the Jesuits used consanguineous men and women as puppets, while the Jesuits controlled and manipulated things behind the public spectacles.

These Europeans, most of whom were slaves to the Jesuits, brought with them their own slaves and indentured servants, some of whom escaped into the wild countryside and formed their own groups and small colonies that would later become villages and towns.

An unwanted side effect of this new wave of immigration of the ruling class was the inclusion of smart, thinking anarchists among the servants who specifically despised their owners and generally opposed any type of government rule. After all, their rights had been stripped so they could serve their masters, so these slaves were in no mood to be ruled by anyone, let alone a new form of government that did nothing to protect their rights as human beings and then continued to enslave them in paradise.

These early dissidents were a constant thorn in the side of the Jesuits, who continually tried to kill them off but eventually found a more effective way to deal with the opposition: infiltrate their groups and control them from within. We see this strategy even today, and it plays out most effectively.

Step Three: Establish Religion

The Jesuits then focused on planting the seeds of Roman Catholicism in the New World, using staunch Catholics from largely Protestant England, which was in the throes of a decidedly anti-Catholic epoch under the rule of Queen Elizabeth I and her successor James I. The first expedition set sail for America in November 1578 with seven ships and 350 men. They were forced to turn back after encountering fierce storms and members of the Spanish Armada.

A second attempt at bringing Catholicism to America began on June 11, 1583, when Sir Humphrey Gilbert led five ships and 200 men to the New World, four ships landing in Newfoundland two months later. Two months following the initial landing, Gilbert set sail for Maine, lost all supplies off his best ship, and then attempted to return to England. On the way, his ship and all hands were lost during a heavy storm. A companion ship returned to England to report the losses.

Captain_George_Weymouth_expedition_in_MaineThe first successful landing of a large contingent of Catholics in America was in 1605, after the Archangel made landfall on an island off the coast of Maine. The best they could do, though, was to plant several crosses in the ground, before returning to England.

England’s former Secretary of State, George Calvert, retired from political life in England and was sent by the Jesuits to Virginia, where he attempted to mingle with established leaders who, it seems, wanted nothing to do with him. So he returned home and had the crown of England grant Calvert a patent on considerable land that would later become the state of Maryland.

He soon became the first Lord of the Jesuit city of Baltimore, and set the stage for the first mass arrival of those who would establish Catholicism as a religion in the New World. I discuss the early history of religion in America in depth, in the upcoming chapter Religion & Cults.

Step Four: Flood the New World With Subservient Roman Catholics

After the Jesuits emplaced their band of governmental and religious leaders, the next step was to seed the New World with subservient citizens who would do their bidding at any time and for a song. For this, the Jesuits turned to their favorite minions, the rabid Catholics of Northern Ireland. Long a tool of Rome, the Irish were easily controlled with religion, drink and moderate threats.

The first ripples of Irish immigrants fell on America’s shores in the 1600s, where they made their way from Caribbean isles that housed Irish and Scottish criminals and misfits. Around 1720, a larger wave arrived and continued on for about 100 years. The majority of them arrived between 1820 and 1845 and settled in large strictly Irish ghettos in New York and Boston and in the Appalachian mountains, where the Scots-Irish became known as the original American “rednecks,” rabble-rousers and home-grown terrorists. In later years, they would be used in some of America’s first false-flag attacks on its own citizens. They moved southward into the Carolinas, Georgia and into the Louisiana Territory, where they established a firm foothold and quickly grew in numbers.

The Jesuits’ method of population transfer forced or coerced Irish citizens onto ships bound for the New World. The Jesuits paid their way, gave them modest seed money, a place to live and plenty of back-breaking work. After all, there were cities to build.

These Irish-Americans were tightly controlled by the Jesuits, who emplaced priests among the population to organize them into specific groups: secondary religious leaders, community leaders, paramilitary soldiers and operators, businessmen and other professionals. As their numbers grew in each major city, the Irish quickly ensconced themselves in government, law enforcement and fire-fighting professions, which allowed the Jesuits to control and manipulate the populations of entire cities and towns. It is no surprise that the Irish also established  the first gangs that later became part of the Jesuits’ organized crime network we still see today.

Michael J.F. McCarthy wrote about how the Irish were ruled by the Jesuits, in his 1912 book The Nonconformist Treason:

“It was a Unionist Government who gave Lord MacDonnell the Under Secretaryship, which proves that he suffered nothing by Unionist Sectarianism. He has had no experience of the self-governing Colonies, he is a Jesuit-educated Roman Catholic, and, while he was Irish Under Secretary, he literally ruled Ireland through the Jesuits—his brother being at the same time an Irish Nationalist member! And how can coercion be a true description of the Unionist policy, when it was the Unionists who gave Ireland her Local Government and Land Purchase?”

How America Was Doomed From the Beginning

America’s Founding Fathers: Sycophants and Cowards

Some of the so-called Founding Fathers were a group of sycophants who took orders either directly from Rome or its public face, the British Crown. True, there were some brave men and women (behind the scenes) among them who genuinely opposed Jesuit rule, and this is why they originally came to America from despotic countries, but few of them ever spoke out publicly against the Jesuits, only venturing the occasional glancing blow that had little effect on its intended target.

Those who openly opposed the Jesuits were silenced, either by threats, assaults or outright murder of themselves and their family members. Many who wrote about Jesuit intrigues did so under pseudonyms, although one is hard pressed to find even one copy of their books in existence today, as the Jesuits were diligent about locating and destroying any book, pamphlet, newspaper or other printed material that openly opposed or criticized their rule or any of their actions. Foreign observers appeared to be the only successful dissenters, often publishing their research findings anonymously in books that were later smuggled into America to warn of the coming storm.

thomas-jefferson-and-abigail-adams-took-totally-different-approaches-to-parentingThomas Jefferson knew from the beginning that the Jesuits were in full control of America, because it was their pet project, one carefully planned decades in advance by Rome. By design, America was built to extract the natural resources of its lands, using slave labor, which would be used to forge the most formidable power on the planet, a slow and methodical process that would take more than 200 years.

When one considers the sheer length of time alone, it feels daunting. However, you must understand that the Jesuits and all other Roman predecessors operated on 50- and 100-year plans, even longer. The continuity of their operations was ensured by strict rules and regulations that were passed on from one generation to the next, one man to his sons and cousins, and so on. Considering long-term projects then, it is quite easy to envision how the Jesuits masterminded the designing and building of a completely new country, including importing the seeds of its citizenry from old stock, and controlling and manipulating, if not destroying outright, the Native Americans who simply got in the way.

Even shortly after the Revolutionary War in America, Jefferson spoke shamefully of the inevitable decline of his beloved new world, America:

“The spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless. A single zealot may become persecutor, and better men be his victims. It can never be too often repeated that the time for fixing every essential right, on a legal basis, is while our rulers are honest, ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war we shall be going down hill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will be heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion.”

The American War of Independence: A Colossal Sham

We are taught that America fought and eventually won wars of independence from England, but the reality is that our “victory” was a carefully staged series of events that created only the illusion of freedom and liberty among the American people, and actually delivered something altogether different: a subjugated system well on its way to becoming one with a fully enslaved population, which is what we see today. While we may have “freedom of speech,” we certainly do not possess true liberty of expression; go too far outside what the Jesuits deem “acceptable,” and you wind up in prison.

America’s Shadow Government: A Transnational Corporation

A prime example: in 1871, the Jesuits formed a shadow government, an international corporation known as the United States of America within the bounds of the District of Columbia. To do so, the Jesuits had Congress pass “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia,” which effectively nullified the original Constitution (The Constitution for the united states of America) and replaced it with a new one, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, which functions in an economic capacity on behalf of the owners of this corporation, the Jesuits.

Why would an area, defined by law as a “state,” need its own “constitution” with wording nearly identical to the original Constitution for the United States?

USAIncThis new constitution operates well beyond the strict bounds of our original Constitution by stripping us of all the rights so granted and replacing them with “relative” rights or privileges. Since 1871, Americans have been living under this privately owned shadow government of the Jesuits, although Americans have been led to believe the original organic Constitution still exists to protect its citizens.

Those who serve the corporation, i.e. all politicians and other employees of the US government, are no longer beholden to the citizens of America. Therefore, when a politician lies to the American people, he is not committing a traitorous act because he is acting on behalf of the corporation, not the American public.

You should treat the American government like a typical corporation, e.g. Walmart or Microsoft: if you do not like the products or services, stop using them, do not support them, and encourage all your family and friends not to support them.

Americans in the 1770s would have revolted against this current malevolent Jesuit behavior, but Americans now do not because you are numbed by drugs and toxins in food, mind-controlling programming in movies, tv shows and news programs, sports and other mindless forms of entertainment and distractions.

Our government today is a puppet show of epic stature and high production value, artistically created and painted in grand fashion by experts in the art of gentle manipulation and persuasion of the American and worldwide public, the vast majority of whom swallow the bait wholesale. Not only that, they beg for more.

The End Game: World Control Under One Roof

America: The World’s Workhorse

How clever the Jesuits to infiltrate and control every country on Mother Earth, then attempt to build an even grander scheme: a mononation and single government that rules over all citizens.

There are many reasons for the creation and implementation of WWI, not the least of which was to bring all nations together—most under force—under one global rule.

LeagueofNationsEnter: the League of Nations (LN). Established in 1920, the LN was designed to prevent further wars by providing a global security force and ensuring all nations’ citizens were effectively disarmed.

One need only take an hour to read the LN’s charter, or covenant, to see hidden purposes. Some glaring examples:

Preamble: . . . to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples.”

Historically the only measure used to effect measurable change in any country was by force and this involved soldiers and weapons of war. Given the LN mandated complete disarmament of each country’s citizens, that left only one entity with the world authority to bear arms: the army of the LN.

As for employing “international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,” what person of sane mind would allow an international group to determine its economic and social evolution? We see today that people of different race and religion cannot agree on the smallest of terms, so imagine having a dispassionate observer dictate how you will conduct your business and personal interests.

Chapter V: The Security Council, Article 23: 1. The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.

Please pay particular attention to the nations that were to be permanent members: Republic of China (now People’s Republic of China), France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (now Russia), the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (now UK), and the United States of America.

These choices were by no means left to chance. China and Russia, even back then, were being manufactured to become world powers that would 1. oppose the US and 2. serve as a manufacturing base that would eventually take over the majority of manufacturing and production jobs from the US.

For hundreds of years, the UK has been the public seat of financial power in the world, with Switzerland serving as the actual power deep behind the black curtain and far removed from public scrutiny.

The US, of course, was still being groomed to be the world leader for a certain period of time, from approximately 1945-2025, so it was imperative to have it not only as a permanent member but recognized leader.

As with many Jesuit intrigues, the LN ultimately failed on many levels and was thus scrapped. They felt they could build a more powerful and globally accepted world government, but needed a bigger spark: WWII.

By the end of The Second Great War, the citizens of the world were beaten down sufficiently to acquiesce to the Jesuits’ latest offering, the United Nations (UN), whose official existence was acknowledged on 24 October 1945, only a few short months following the end of WWI.

One World, One Lawful Government

Think here: such a lofty idea, the creation of a world governing body, should have taken many years. And, in fact, it did. Decades, even. The Jesuits planned to establish the UN shortly after it became evident that the League of Nations would not gain sufficient hold to become the world’s leading governing body. Everything had been in place over the years. All that was necessary was the small matter of bringing WWII to a dramatic close.

Since its inception, the UN has secretly been the international face of the Jesuits, which have secretly ghostwritten many “international treaties and resolutions” that have subjugated the rights of citizens the world over. Although never advertised by BigMedia, various UN treaties and resolutions have stripped Americans of various rights that were previously guaranteed by the US Constitution.

In fact, the Jesuits are using the UN to slowly erode the Constitution so much that it is little more than a dead letter. The latest insults are aimed at disarming American citizens, with the passage of the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which takes careful aim at our Constitution’s Second Amendment: Right to Bear Arms. Like all other UN issues, this one has been ongoing officially for more than 60 years, with the establishment of the UN’s Disarmament Commission.

UNODAThe UN now even has an entire department, United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) and its Conventional Arms Branch (CAB), solely dedicated to disarming all citizens of the world.

From their website: “On 2 April 2013, the General Assembly adopted the landmark Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), regulating the international trade in conventional arms, from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. The treaty will foster peace and security by thwarting uncontrolled destabilizing arms flows to conflict regions. It will prevent human rights abusers and violators of the law of war from being supplied with arms. And it will help keep warlords, pirates, and gangs from acquiring these deadly tools.”

While UNODA and CAB cleverly advertise ATT as targeting criminals and illegal activity, it’s real purpose is to disarm Americans. After all, the greatest threat to the Jesuits is an armed citizenry: one with weapons capable of assaulting and killing their leaders and fighting their soldiers, and one with intimate knowledge about the Jesuits and their machinations. If they can take away your weapons and keep you ignorant of their actions, then they have already won. The next step is simply to carry out their planned actions to further enslave you and reach their end game.

The UN also has passed measures that allow foreign military troops on American soil “for training purposes.” What they really mean is, since our own Constitution does not allow our military to take up arms against US citizens, the UN established a way around this law, and has already secretly been implementing it for more than 30 years.

An example of how the UN will use foreign troops in America: a false-flag attack by a Jesuit organization (CIA, Mossad, Virginia Militia, or some covert unit) provokes Americans to riot. Federal and local law enforcement will be “overwhelmed” by the rioters. Officials then invoke the Canada-US Civil Assistance Plan to allow foreign troops inside US borders as “law-enforcement providers,” granted with wide power to quell the riot and any further uprising by any means necessary.

One can only imagine the carnage inflicted on the American people by this foreign armed force, and the aftermath of such an act. If the trust of the American people had been on thin ice before such a movement, think of the possible repercussions. There is no longer any safety or security, only tentative peace and temporary comfort.

Consider the Jesuits’ bottom line in establishing and maintaining governments all over the world: the Jesuits completely control a government, and a government completely controls its people.

Today’s Average American Citizens: Lazy, Ignorant Cowards

Look around you today. What do you see? An entire planet of more than 165 individual governments, with more than 7 billion people, most of whom live in distressed physical and economic conditions, and almost none of whom say a word about it, let alone take up arms and overthrow their oppressors.

Perhaps surprising to many, Thomas Jefferson had this to say about government:

“Societies exist under three forms, sufficiently distinguishable. 1. Without government, as among our Indians. 2. Under government wherein the will of every one has a just influence; as is the case in England in a slight degree, and in our States in a great one. 3. Under government of force, as is the case in all other monarchies, and in most of the other republics. To have an idea of the curse of existence in these last, they must be seen. It is a government of wolves over sheep. It is a problem not clear in my mind that the first condition is not the best. But I believe it to be inconsistent with any great degree of population. The second state has a great deal of good in it . . . It has its evils too, the principal of which is the turbulence to which it is subject . . . But even this evil is productive of good. It prevents the degeneracy of government, and nourishes a general attention to public affairs. I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing.”

Jefferson wrote the following to a fellow correspondent:

“God forbid that we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion! . . . What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that the people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take up arms . . . The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”

Unfortunately, today’s average American citizen is too preoccupied with noise and distractions to voice any opposition to the despotic American government, let alone do anything meaningful to change it for the better. Worst of all, Americans have no idea of the hidden power behind the public government.

bookcoverVoltairine de Cleyre’s words, written more than 100 years ago, echo loudly throughout America today:

“Even within the lifetime of the revolutionists, the spirit decayed. The love of material ease has been, in the mass of men and permanently speaking, always greater than the love of liberty. Nine hundred and ninety-nine women out of a thousand are more interested in the cut of a dress than in the independence of their sex; nine hundred and ninety-nine men out of a thousand are more interested in drinking a glass of beer than in questioning the tax that is laid on it; how many children are not willing to trade the liberty to play for the promise of a new cap or a new dress?”

How is it that the words of this brilliant thinker did not penetrate the minds of Americans a century ago? Even then, the Jesuits’ clever PR machine spun Voltairine de Cleyre as an “anarchist,” a dangerous criminal who opposed “good” government and, therefore, the people under it. The free-thinking de Cleyre was branded the equivalent of a “conspiracy theorist” by the Jesuits, and was thus banished to the fringes of society, her words seemingly lost even in the mild breeze.

A similar sentiment was made by Luther Kauffman, Esq. in an address to leaders of The Methodist Episcopal Ministers’ Meeting on December 12, 1921. It was later published as a small book, Romanism As a World Power:

“The great sin and crime of the American people is indifference to public affairs. We are all of us, so much concerned with the accumulation of wealth, or the pursuit of pleasure, that we forget the great heritage of a free government and free institutions which have been handed down to us by our patriotic fathers.

“The American people, as a whole, are very much in the position of a spendthrift, who has inherited a magnificent estate from his forefathers—an estate in which he has had no part in the accumulation thereof—but which he is neglecting and permitting to go to ruin. The beautiful palace in which he lives is going to decay; the beautiful lawn is being filled with weeds; the fences tumbling down; and a general spirit of negligence and wastefulness prevalent everywhere.”

Silencing Dissent and Opposition Among the American People

Unfortunately, in today’s rough climate, it is becoming more dangerous to voice one’s own opinion, especially if it counters the moves of the Jesuits. One need only read the summary of a paper by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, Conspiracy Theories, to appreciate the lengths this government is willing to go to silence dissenters:

Conspiracy-Theory“Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a “crippled epistemology,” in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.”

Before the first sentence can complete itself, it gives away the trumped-up essence of the Jesuits’ argument against those who would argue against their policies:

“Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories. . . .”

According to William Garner, the mere act of elevating one’s personal belief to a “theory” is preposterous at best, dangerous and sinister at worst. In any sound study of science, one comes up with a question about a particular subject. He then proceeds to formulate a hypothesis that seeks not only to understand but to provide a definitive answer to his original question. After sufficient and careful study, the researcher comes to a conclusion that either supports or refutes his hypothesis. And after more and more study and examination, perhaps this original hypothesis is further proven to be so robust that he elevates his hypothesis to the lofty and important position of “theory.”

This new theory is now seen as highly significant in, and important  to, that particular field of study. Proponents may not only support it openly and publicly, they may venerate it because of its extreme rank and gravity. This new theory is then published, its contents widely disseminated for all to see, admire and study further.

William Garner contends that, what makes the Sunstein/Vermeule paper so dangerous to ordinary American citizens is the fact the Jesuits have immediately elevated what should be called and universally accepted as a personal opinion or even hypothesis to the lofty and important rank of theory, artificially placing huge importance on, and calling undue attention to, that so-called “theory,” and even calling it a potential danger or imminent threat to the government. This practice is also dangerous to ordinary Americans because it immediately labels that “theorist” as a threat to the Jesuits, providing them swift recourse to pursue legal (or unlawful lethal) action against the “conspiracy theorist.”

Let’s consider another angle: if some ordinary person formulates a hypothesis that 9/11 was an inside job, perpetrated by the Israelis, and the government does not have in place its term “conspiracy theory” or “conspiracy theorist,” then that accusation leveled by this ordinary American might be called a “crackpot idea” or “silly notion” or simply “one man’s hypothesis,” and be summarily dismissed by the government simply because it is only one man’s belief, not one to be taken seriously. And because it is ignored by the government, it is similarly dismissed by everyone else. After all, it was only a person idea or hypothesis, something we Americans have every day. Who could possibly take those seriously, let alone consider them a threat?

However, once you take that same “hypothesis” by this ordinary American and slap on a toxic label like DANGER: CONSPIRACY THEORY, the whole situation changes from a child’s game or amateur’s free expression to serious combat where the Jesuits now have an “excuse” to legally pursue action against this man. And they could interpret legally his behavior under the Patriot Act, which may automatically brand him a domestic terrorist, one subject to immediate prosecution and imprisonment. Habeas corpus would be suspended.

Frightening as it sounds, it is indeed a clear and present threat to all members of American society, especially those who speak out against the government and the Jesuits. Any ordinary American can be labeled a terrorist and be thrown in prison without legal recourse of any kind and without any contact with his family or the outside world. Indefinitely.

History Repeats Itself On a Grand Scale

This same dangerous practice has been used in the past, although not using the same language, “conspiracy theory.”

proclamation-by-king-largeOn May 21, 1792, King George III issued a dangerous proclamation that sought not only to counter “seditious writings” against the royal crown, but to develop an information log about all accused persons and those “aiding and abetting” them. While the King did not openly threaten anyone, it was understood that anyone accused of such “seditious writing” would have his head separated from his body. And that was after being hanged until barely conscious, then thrown on a rack to be cut up slowly. Very slowly. Consider the King’s threat:

“Whereas diverse wicked and seditious writings have been printed, published, and industriously dispersed, tending to excite tumult and disorder, by raising groundless jealousies and discontents in the minds of our faithful and loving subjects, respecting the laws and happy constitution of our government, civil and religious, established in this kingdom; and endeavoring to vilify and bring into contempt the wise and wholesome provisions made at the time of the glorious revolution, and since strengthened and confirmed by subsequent laws, for the preservation and security of the rights and liberties of our faithful and loving subjects: and whereas, diverse writings have also been printed, published, and industriously dispersed, recommending the said wicked and seditious publications to the attention of all our faithful and loving subjects; and whereas, we have also reason to believe, that correspondences have been entered into with sundry persons in foreign parts, with a view to forward the criminal and wicked purposes above-mentioned: and whereas, the wealth, happiness and prosperity of this kingdom do, under Divine Providence, chiefly depend upon a due submission to the laws, a just confidence in the integrity and wisdom of Parliament, and a continuance to the zealous attachment to the government and constitution of the kingdom, which has ever prevailed in the minds of the people thereof; and whereas, there is nothing which we so earnestly desire, as to secure the public peace and prosperity, and to preserve to all our loving subjects the full enjoyment of their rights and liberties, both religious and civil; We, therefore, being resolved, as far as in us lies, to repress the wicked and seditious practices aforesaid, and to deter all persons from following so pernicious an example, have thought fit, by the advice of our privy counsel, to issue this our royal proclamation, solemnly warning all our loving subjects, as they tender their own happiness, and that of their posterity, to guard against all such attempts, which aim at the subversion of all regular government within this kingdom, and which are inconsistent with the peace and order of society; and earnestly exhorting them at all times, and to the utmost of their power, to avoid and discourage all proceedings, tending to produce riots and tumults; and we do strictly charge and command all our magistrates in and throughout our kingdom of Great Britain, that they do, in their several and respective stations, take the most immediate and effectual care to suppress and prevent all riots, tumults, and other disorders, which may be attempted to be raised or made by any person or persons, which, on whatever protects they are grounded, are not only contrary to law, but dangerous to the most important interests of the kingdom; and we do further require and command all and every one of our magistrates aforesaid, that they do, from time to time, transmit to one of our principal secretaries of state, due and full information about such persons as shall be found offending aforesaid, or in any degree aiding or abetting therein; it being our determination, for the preservation of the peace and happiness of our faithful and loving subjects, to carry the laws vigorously into execution against such offenders as aforesaid.

Given at our Court at the Queen’s-house, the 21st day of May, 1792, in the thirty-second year of our reign.

God save the King.”

Freedom and Liberty: The Difference Can Kill You

The subjugation of Americans’ freedom and liberty has been ongoing since America’s founding. But what is freedom, really? And what is liberty?

William Garner said:

“Freedom is merely a two-dimension concept of independence, something written on paper. It’s like having a million bucks in the bank and never spending it. But liberty is something quite different and significant: liberty is freedom in motion, actually going out and spending that million dollars.”

Look all around you, study history over decades and centuries and clear and distinct patterns of behavior and action will emerge: the Jesuits have slowly and stealthily subjugated the rights and liberties of American citizens. You are now living under a shadow government that exerts dangerous control, and this insidious cloak is well disguised by all the noise and distractions of family, work, health, play time, BigEntertainment, BigSports, etc. In addition to being distracted, you are chemically numbed by demoralizing and depressing news and information that continually bombards you each day.

The only possible relief you can hope to get comes from educating yourself about the system that controls you and your liberty, your rights. Only then can you begin to appreciate how serious this situation really is, and make changes in your life to counter it.

For those of you who ask, “When does the world collapse?” In a few billion years, probably. But your life as you know it will probably continue without much fuss, if you keep your head in the sand and don’t keep up with current events, ignore mainstream news, allow yourself to be entertained and trained by BigMedia and BigEntertainment, and steer clear of political and economic issues. Other than those little details, most likely you will not feel a thing during your lifetime.