William Garner shares his letter to Bumble Bee Seafoods. His daughter, Tripsy South, posted an article about former president and CEO Chris Lischewski. Read more
The woes of the world, explained in two hours, in this dynamic chat between William Dean A. Garner and host George Kavassilas:
America is not our country.
It is a formal corporation owned, operated and controlled by the jesuits, who designed it from its inception.
However, we are Americans as a whole, until we come up with a better name that describes us collectively.
The jesuits have found new and clever ways to further divide Americans, the latest of which is having prominent sports personalities bend the knee during an anthem that was advertised to represent unity and patriotism in our common country.
The national anthem does not represent our fellow men, women and children who share our values of goodness.
It represents a fictitious country owned by a jesuit corporation.
Bending the knee represents blind subservience to the jesuits and this fictitious corporation. Read more
We’re all taught that “freedom of speech” is important to a so-called “democratic” process. Democracy does not exist anywhere on the planet except in the dictionary and in useless textbooks.
Freedom is nothing more than a concept of independence, something written on paper or spoken about that provides Americans the grand illusion that we are free to express ourselves any way we wish. Read more
“…The Jesuits have not yet killed me. But they would have surely done it when I passed through their most devoted city, Baltimore, had I not defeated their plans, by passing incognito a few hours before they expected me… The Pope and the Jesuits, with their infernal Inquisition, are the only organized powers in the world which have recourse to the dagger of the assassin to murder those whom they cannot convince with their arguments or conquer with the sword… New projects of assassination are detected almost every day, accompanied with such savage circumstances, that they bring to my memory the massacre of St. Bartholomew and the Gunpowder Plot. Our investigation indicates that they come from the same masters in the act of murder, the Jesuits… So many plots have already been made against my life, that it is a real miracle that they have all failed, when we consider that the great majority of them were in the hands of skillful Roman Catholic murderers, evidently trained by Jesuits….The Jesuits are so expert in those deeds of blood that Henry IV said that it was impossible to escape them, and he became their victim, though he did all that could be done to protect himself. My escape from their hands, since the letter of the pope [Pope Pius IX] to Jeff Davis has sharpened a million of daggers to pierce my breast, would be more than a miracle.”
There’re three main powers in this world:
- The immediate public face, e.g. President Donald Trump and the US government
- The secret power behind the throne, i.e. the Jesuits
- The extraterrestrial power that guides the Jesuits
Americans are especially angry at Donald Trump and his so-called policies.
How can this be, given he is but a mere puppet of the real power, not to mention an overblown cartoon character who is merely playing a role in a grand performance?
It is easy (and lazy) to throw stones at the most readily available target, which is always some power directly in the public eye.
In fact, it’s too easy . . . and solves nothing, except to temporarily relieve Americans of their anxiety.
A crucial purpose of any public face is to attract and absorb blows from the populace, and that’s exactly what Trump does.
Are you ready to learn and absorb these facts?
If so, please begin with two short books, Who Really Owns Your Gold, Fourth Ed. and Romanic Depression (Book One), both available on Amazon.
In the least, you will begin to realize your true intended target and take steps to adjust your aim, i.e. way of thinking and acting when you’re confronted with significant changes in America’s political system, economy, etc.
Until you understand who the true power is, you will continue to be frustrated at the system and waste your breath on public faces of power, not the actual entity that runs roughshod over all of us.
What’s more, if you feel better after blasting Trump, then you’ve truly squandered your precious energy.
Imagine if we dismantled just ONE of the Jesuits’ powerful tools: the IRS and its worldwide collection services. Yes, worldwide. That means the IRS will take your money even if you live overseas, and it will sometimes prevent your attempting to relinquish your US citizenship.
If we did in fact dismantle the IRS, $2.7 TRILLION dollars of American taxes would be available yearly to Americans. That’s an average of 27% of each Americans’ yearly income, or about $15,000.
Yes, that is accurate: each year, $2.7 TRILLION dollars of our hard-earned money goes out of this country and flows electronically all the way to Basel, Switzerland, to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
The American debt is an artificially created one, designed to decimate The Middle Class and place us effectively into the bottom economic category: the poor class. [Argue, kick and scream all you want, but it’s an accurate fact. After you’re done with that hissy-fit, do some basic research on the origins of our country and its economy. You’ll need about 100 hours of free time to gain a small understanding, but it’s a wonderful beginning.]
Then, with only two classes of society, the wealthy and the poor, the Jesuits can better manipulate and rule. If you’ve traveled extensively overseas, you have already witnessed this phenomenon: South America, Central America, Russia and all Eastern European nations, German, Italy, UK, Japan, China, Indonesia, etc.
If the US’s current debt continues to mount, our economy will collapse, as it cannot be sustained, owing so much to the usurious BIS, the world’s central bank.
Our artificially propped-up geoeconomy also will go the way of the dodo bird and result in a severe shock to the world’s financial system that results in The Middle Class being crushed, along with all the low rungs of the wealthy class, i.e. those earning less than $50M a year.
The previously wealthy would then constitute the new middle class, unless they lost all their earnings and thus joined the rest of us in the poor class. Have you listened to conversations among the wealthy? The men talk ceaselessly about their money and investments . . . and if any time is left in the evening, they talk about their mistresses.
Sadly, the current economic “models,” developed by some great thinking minds, are all NULL and VOID, because not one of them even considers the ever-present hidden hand of the Jesuits manipulating all markets behind the scenes. But those formulas do look impressive, backed up with reams of useless data.
Yeah, imagine if we could dismantle the IRS and its worldwide collection services.
Keep imagining. . . .
Have you ever wondered how NASA manages to get high-resolution images of Mars, but has no clue about our own moon?
We Americans don’t know anything about our moon, except what NASA tells us: it’s 238,000 miles from Earth.
That’s crap, of course.
The moon orbits above Flat Plane Earth about 3,600 miles. No more.
And it’s the same size as the sun that orbits above Flat Place Earth about 3,600 miles.
How is it that we believe NASA’s lies and never question them?
Please take a look at this article and ask yourself, “How can NASA know more about Mars than our own moon?”
- Imagery from “Mars” is faked. Period.
- Accurate facts about our moon are concealed from the public. If revealed, they would show our moon orbiting a flat plane Earth at about 3,600 miles, if not closer, and is the same diameter as our sun, which also orbits above flat plane Earth at a similar altitude.
Sean Maclaren’s first in a new series of books, Romanic Depression (Book One), details how the Jesuits have designed, built and destroyed America. Maclaren uses many different sectors of society as examples.
No exaggeration, stating they have destroyed it.
It is not a final scorched-earth destruction, for the most part.
Rather, a slow and insidious fall into what I term “fail-maintenance.”
What Is Fail-Maintenance?
Fail-maintenance refers to maintaining something that is forced to exist in a continual state of failure, or at least approaching it.
More specifically, fail-maintenance is a slow and deliberate decaying of services, products, objects and people, regardless of the apparently high quality of those entities. Read more
More details can be found in our books, Who Really Owns Your Gold, Third Edition, and Romanic Depression, Book One, both available on Amazon.
People often tell me about “researchers” and “investigators” who seemingly blow the whistle about harmful chemicals like glyphosate, then ask, “If these researchers can expose something so harmful in public, they must be legitimate.” Or, “This one investigator’s website got more than 50 million visits last year!” Read more
“In 1994 President Clinton signed the Brady Bill into law . . . it was a stupid crazy law, and the national media to this day has not told the truth about the Brady Bill. It was the first time in history where the federal government attempted to commandeer the office of Sheriff for federal bidding and literally forcing us—sheriffs across the country—to participate in a gun-control law and they literally threatened to arrest us if we failed to comply. I was the first sheriff in American history to sue the federal government in the United States Supreme Court and win. Six other sheriffs joined that lawsuit and Sheriff Jay Printz and I ended up at the Supreme Court together. It cost me my re-election bid and it catapulted him. . . .” —Sheriff Richard Mack
Sheriff Richard Mack is best known for having sued the federal government in 1994 over the Brady Bill, portions of which attempted to force states to perform background checks on anyone trying to buy a handgun. He and fellow Sheriff Jay Printz won their case at the Supreme Court. Now, more than 20 years later, has their landmark victory actually done any good? Sheriff Mack told me that practically no sheriff in office today has even heard of the fight, let alone read the Supreme Court decision, and that alone is heartbreaking. Moreover, that hard-fought won appears to have done next to nothing toward empowering today’s county sheriff, even though that position is arguably the most powerful in the land.
Recently, I had the honor and pleasure of chatting with Sheriff Mack about several issues, including the concept of the “Constitutional Sheriff,” a position he feels should be mandatory in every county in America.
Which US Constitution do the Sheriffs of America to enforce the laws of their counties?
I don’t think sheriffs are familiar with either one and that’s the problem. They just take orders from the legislators and the judges, and again that’s a mistake because law enforcement is part of the Executive Branch. We are the executors of the law. There are three separate branches of the government that protect our liberties. The law-enforcement community will readily admit they are completely controlled by the other two branches. Right there, we have destroyed one-third of the checks and balances established by the separation of powers. They [sheriffs] wouldn’t know either Constitution if it hit them in the head.
Sometime in US history, sheriffs stopped studying the Constitution. When and why did this occur? Was it by design?
A lot of it happened at the end of the Civil War because the federal government became all-powerful. They also needed a way to keep sheriffs and elected officials from experimenting with things like state sovereignty, so that gave rise to the legalized bribery system known as “federal grants.” So they’ve been buying off local officials through those federal grants for a long time. I’d like to remind you all that we in law enforcement are not puppets of legislators, we are not puppets of the judicial system, we must remain independent. We must know the Constitution and we must enforce it. We have lost the Executive Branch as a means of checks and balances of the corrupt judges and politicians.
What specific wording in the Constitution gives a sheriff the right to oppose the federal government?
As soon as that sheriff takes his or her oath, they’ve made that commitment. He swore to uphold, defend, protect and preserve the Constitution—the organic one. In my lawsuit, the judge said, “Sheriff Mack was given the choice of keeping his oath or obeying the law,” and I’d say that it was the most important point that every sheriff, cop and chief of police learned in this country: when a legislative body gives you a law for you to enforce, you can tell them no to the legislators, and I believe it is our responsibility to do just that.
A historical proof of that: Rosa Parks was taken to jail and booked because of the charge: not giving her seat to a white man. I ask law-enforcement officials this: you go back into time, to September 1, 1955. Are you going to arrest her or are you going to make sure that she gets home safely? Most cops say they wouldn’t have arrested her, but I say baloney because you do the opposite today: you write all these ridiculous tickets, you force people to wear a seatbelt.
The sheriff has an obligation to say no to local and federal legislators. If anybody from the federal government commits a crime ,I will stand against them, and I will protect the people of my county because that it what I promised to do and that is what my job is for, and I will not allow them to be abused or victimized by any public official of any kind or some bureaucrat from Washington, DC. That’s what we’re supposed to do. Period. End of story.
Who is a sheriff’s boss?
The people of his county.
What can a judge tell a sheriff?
Not a damn thing.
The judge is a partner.
The sheriff is required to work with a judge, but not for a judge. If a judge tells a sheriff to go arrest somebody, the sheriff investigates it and decides what to do. In my county, I opposed the judge at times. One time, he told me to go evict a Mexican family, and I told him, “I’m not going to do this. You can try and get somebody else to do it, but I will stop them, too.”
Did any politicians ever tell you what to do?
One time early on, I went to a meeting in Phoenix, where they tried to tell me this is how it’s done. I never saw so many drunks, so many people using such foul language. These people [politicians] try to look so honorable, somebody worthy of admiration, and nothing could be further from the truth. They are not honorable, they are not good people. They have drinking problems, marital problems, morality problems, and they do not care about the people they are supposed to be serving.
The only other time was the federal government telling me to enforce the Brady Bill and I sued them. I don’t think we as Sheriffs and law enforcement should be suing. We should be doing, not suing. We should be saying no and standing firm. I do not advocate violence, but I do advocate standing strong and standing with numbers.
How can American sheriffs openly oppose the federal government and do so without retribution?
A lot of them getting together and doing it. If you only have one or two, they’ll make an example of them. We have had some stand as lone rangers. Sheriff Glenn Palmer in Grant County, Oregon has been fighting the Forest Service and protecting his citizens from the capricious laws for over 12 years, and he keeps getting re-elected in landslides.
Sheriff Dave Mattis of Bighorn County, Wyoming was the first Constitutional sheriff and he stood against the IRS and others. He had a policy that all federal agents had to check with him before they did anything in his county. Every sheriff should have that. And every federal agent should want that, because they want to do it right.
Sheriff Brad Rogers from Elkhart County, Indiana defended an Amish farmer who didn’t even vote. This guy was being attacked by the FDA telling him to pasteurize his milk. They came in a did spot inspections on his dairy farm and he passed them all. They found no diseases, nothing wrong but they kept coming after him anyway. Finally, he calls the sheriff and says, “I’m tired of this charade, I’ve opened up my property to these people when I didn’t have to, and I want to left alone now.” The sheriff told the FDA that if they came back in his county again without duly signed warrants, he would arrest them for trespassing. The FDA then threatened to arrest the sheriff for felony obstruction of justice, so Sheriff Rogers called me and we drafted a letter to the FDA. Soon after, the Amish farmer got a letter from the FDA saying everything was okay and they [FDA] haven’t been back in three years.
Imagine if every state had a dozen or more sheriffs doing just that and defending liberty as their ultimate goal. What if we had somebody who put liberty and freedom first, the rights of the individual first and against any bureaucrat coming into their county. That would spell exactly what our goal is: restoring liberty.
What if we had 3,000 sheriffs doing just this: defending liberty and the organic Constitution?
We would literally change this country tomorrow.
If you want to take back America, then have a Constitutional Sheriff in your county. A Constitutional Sheriff* is one who keeps his oath of office and knows and understands the organic Constitution, and who enforces the principles of liberty.
*Today, just over 10% of all Sheriffs in America are Constitutional Sheriffs.
“Jesuit math: 1/2 truth + 1/2 truth = The Whole Truth.”
—William Dean A. Garner